Antonio Penaloza v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Antonio Penaloza |
| County of Los Angeles, Diego Arias, Brandon Barr and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07407 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court continues the in-person Scheduling Conference from 11/26/2021 to 12/3/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. The parties shall file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report no later than 10 days before the scheduling conference and deliver it to Judge Blumenfelds Chambers email (in Word format).THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets an in person Scheduling Conference for 11/26/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. The parties shall file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report no later than 10 days before the scheduling conference and deliver it to Judge Blumenfelds Chambers email (in Word format). (vcr)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Diego Arias, Brandon Barr, County of Los Angeles, (Inlow, Laura) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Diego Arias, Brandon Barr, County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Laura Inlow added to party Diego Arias(pty:dft), Attorney Laura Inlow added to party Brandon Barr(pty:dft), Attorney Laura Inlow added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Inlow, Laura) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Penaloza, upon Defendant Diego Arias served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Frederickson#437768 Subpoena Control in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Penaloza, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 9/28/2021, answer due 10/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon County of Los Angeles in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Penaloza, upon Defendant Brandon Barr served on 9/29/2021, answer due 10/20/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Deputy Meza, authorized to accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 11 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants County of Los Angeles, Diego Arias, Brandon Barr, and DOes 1 through 10, inclusive. (gk) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Antonio Penaloza. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF Antonio Penaloza, (Dunn, Brian) |
|
Filing 8
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption on the document uploaded to the docket entry number referenced above does not match the case information on the docket (e.g., case title, case number, document name, etc.). The Court may 1)order an amended or corrected document to be filed, 2)order the document stricken, or 3)take other action the Court deems appropriate. You may file a Notice of Errata attaching a corrected version of the document, but you are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ANTONIO PENALOZA. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 1 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed as COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31991215 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff ANTONIO PENALOZA. (Attorney Brian T Dunn added to party ANTONIO PENALOZA(pty:pla))(Dunn, Brian) Modified on 9/16/2021 (et). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
