Jesse Graham v. Cable News Network Inc.
| Jesse Graham |
| Cable News Network Inc. |
| 2:2021cv07417 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 70
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #67 filed by Jesse Graham. CCA # 23-55518. Appeal No. 23-55518 is dismissed as duplicative of closed appeal No.22-55134. This order served on the district court will act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 23-55518. (car)
|
| Filing 69 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 23-55518 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #67 as to Plaintiff Jesse Graham. (car) |
| Filing 68 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to Plaintiff Jesse Graham, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #67 . (mat) |
| Filing 67 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff Jesse Graham. Appeal of Judgment #48 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 . (Appeal Fee - In forma pauperis status granted on 01/20/2022). (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 66 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #50 , CCA # 22-55134. The judgment of this Court, entered December 19, 2022, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [See USCA Memorandum #65 AFFIRMED.](mat) |
| Filing 65 MEMORANDUM from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #50 filed by Jesse Graham. CCA # 22-55134. Graham's motion regarding the answering brief (Docket Entry No. 13) isdenied. District Court's decision is AFFIRMED. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). (lc) |
|
Filing 64
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #59 filed by Jesse Graham. CCA # 22-56040. Appeal No. 22-56040 is dismissed as duplicative of closed appeal No. 22-55034. Appellants appeal from the final judgment entered in the district court on January 21, 2022 is proceeding in this court as appeal No. 22-55134. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 22-56040. (car)
|
| Filing 63 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 22-56040 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #59 as to Plaintiff Jesse Graham. (rolm) |
|
Filing 62
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Second APPLICATION to Reopen Case final Judgment order #58 , for the following reasons: Case number is incorrect or missing. Case is closed. Case is on appeal before the Ninth Circuit. (rolm)
|
| Filing 61 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Plaintiff's Second APPLICATION to Reopen Case final Judgment order #58 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document submitted in the wrong case. Documents for another case and Judge as: 2:22-CV-3887 JFW-PDx (Judge Walters). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 60 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to plaintiff Jesse Graham, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #59 . (mat) |
| Filing 59 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Appeal fee of $505 paid.) (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 58 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 11/09/22 SEE DOCKET NO. 62] Second APPLICATION to Reopen Case final Judgment order filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order order) (Graham, Jesse) Modified on 11/9/2022 (rolm). |
|
Filing 57
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #50 filed by Jesse Graham. CCA # 22-55134. Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is treated in part as a motion to reinstate this appeal and is granted. The June 21, 2022 order is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. (mat)
|
|
Filing 56
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #50 filed by Jesse Graham. CCA # 22-55134. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. (mat)
|
| Filing 55 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #44 , CCA # 22-55034. The judgment of this Court, entered January 21, 2022, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. [See USCA Order, #49 DISMISSED.](mat) |
|
Filing 54
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #44 filed by Jesse Graham. CCA # 22-55034. Appellant's motion for reconsideration is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. (mat)
|
| Filing 53 credit card payment filed by Plaintiff Jesse Graham Payment reciept for payment re: Appeal Fees Paid (Graham, Jesse) |
|
Filing 52
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #50 filed by Jesse Graham. CCA # 22-55134. A review of this court's docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. If appellant fails to comply with this order, this appeal may be dismissed by the (9TH CCA) Clerk for failure to prosecute.[ See document for more details.](mat)
|
| Filing 51 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 22-55134 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #50 as to plaintiff Jesse Graham. (lc) |
| Filing 50 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. Appeal of Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, #47 , Judgment #48 . (Appeal Fee - 500 Previously Paid on 12/30/21.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of appeal)(Graham, Jesse) |
|
Filing 49
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #44 filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. CCA # 22-55034. A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered in the district court on January 21, 2022. (lc)
|
| Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Pursuant to this Court's Order Dismissing Action #47 , IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing from this action (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc) |
|
Filing 47
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DISMISSING ACTIONThe Court ordered Plaintiff Jesse Graham to show cause why the action shouldnot be dismissed for Plaintiffs fabrication of a court document #43 . Plaintiff did not file a response within the allotted 14 days. The Court required Plaintiff to address his submission of fraudulent documents to the Court. Plaintiff elected not to respond even while appealing another court order. ECF No. 44. Plaintiff has made his choice to disregard the Courts order, so no less drastic sanction than dismissal would communicate to Plaintiff the gravity of his actions. The Court concludes the Pagtalunan factors weigh in favor of dismissal. The Court dismisses the action with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. (lc)
|
| Filing 46 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 22-55034 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #44 as to plaintiff Jesse Graham. (lc) |
| Filing 45 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to plaintiff Jesse Graham, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #44 . (mat) |
| APPEAL FEE PAID: re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #44 as to Plaintiff Jesse Graham; Receipt Number: LA232553 in the amount of $505. (Pastrana Hernandez, Krystal) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. Appeal of Order on Motion for Default Judgment,,, Order on Motion to Set Aside Default,, #43 . (Appeal fee of $505 paid.) (Graham, Jesse) |
|
Filing 43
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT (ECF NO. #35 ), ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF NO. #34 ), and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court lacks jurisdiction over Defendant because it has not been served properly. Thus, the Court GRANTS the motion to set aside default #35 and DENIES the motion for default judgment #34 . The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not dismiss the case for Plaintiff's falsification of a court document. Plaintiff shall file a response within 14 days of this order. See document for details. (smo)
|
|
Filing 42
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION (ECF No. #35 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion to Set Aside Default (ECF No. #35 ) and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion(s), noticed for hearing on December 20, 2021, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 41 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Default Re: Clerks Entry of Default (CV-37) - optional html form #28 . #35 filed by Defendant Cable News Network Inc.. (Jampol, Nicolas) |
|
Filing 40
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION (ECF No. #34 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Third Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. #34 ) and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion(s), noticed for hearing on December 13, 2021, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 39 OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 38 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Default Re: Clerks Entry of Default (CV-37) - optional html form #28 . #35 , Third NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc #34 filed by Plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First class mail tracking sept 24 2021, #2 Exhibit First class mail tracking sept 24, 2021oct 26, #3 Exhibit 3680 Sunset location, #4 Exhibit cable news broadcasting)(Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 37 OPPOSITION to Third NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc #34 filed by Defendant Cable News Network Inc.. (Jampol, Nicolas) |
| Filing 36 DECLARATION of Daniel Weinberger in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Default Re: Clerks Entry of Default (CV-37) - optional html form #28 . #35 filed by Defendant Cable News Network Inc.. (Jampol, Nicolas) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Default Re: Clerks Entry of Default (CV-37) - optional html form #28 . filed by Defendant Cable News Network Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/20/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attorney Nicolas A Jampol added to party Cable News Network Inc.(pty:dft)) (Jampol, Nicolas) |
| Filing 34 Third NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. Motion set for hearing on 12/13/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed order, #2 Proposed Order proposed judgment, #3 Affidavit Affidavit of support/declaration, #4 Exhibit mailing reciept from default) (Graham, Jesse) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi re First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Correct First REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc #32 . The following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order for the following reason(s): (1) Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. (2) Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): Plaintiff should file a notice of motion and motion for default judgment together with a proposed order and/or proposed judgment and should include a proof of service. The motion must provide at least 28 days notice of the hearing to the defendants. (lc) Modified on 11/12/2021 (lc).
|
| Filing 32 (STRICKEN PER 11/11/2021 ORDER DOCKET NO. 33 ) .First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Correct First REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc #29 filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. Motion set for hearing on 11/29/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of points) (Graham, Jesse) Modified on 11/12/2021 (lc). |
| Filing 31 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: First REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc #29 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by November 10, 2021. (smo) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc #29 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. This is a Trademark Case. Pro Se Filer is advised "request" format is not applicable. Please review Local Rules requirement in filing Notice and Motion for default Judgment. Missing Memorandum in support; Missing separate proposed Judgment. See Correct event for Motion for default Judgment; The event will prompt filer to select proper date, time and selection of assigned Judge. All missing in current filing Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Motion : Default Judgment. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 29 First REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant Cable News Network inc filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 28 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Cable News Network Inc (lc) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham, re Fourth REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. #26 Rule 4. FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE served on 9/24/2021. (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 26 Fourth REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Proof of service declaration) (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 25 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DENYING THIRD APPLICATION FOR CLERK TO ENTER FOR DEFAULT #22 . Plaintiff Jesse Graham moves the Court to enter default against Defendant Cable News Network Inc. on his claim for copyright infringement. The clerk notified the Plaintiff that he did not provide sufficient information regarding Proof of Service to enter default #23 . The clerk subsequently referred this application for default to the Court. In his motion for default, Plaintiff does not provide any information beyond what the process server alleges #22 . Specifically, Plaintiff does not allege that "Joe last name unknown" is a designated agent of Cable News Network Inc., is authorized to accept service on behalf of Cable News Network Inc., or is the type of corporate officer who can accept service under Federal or California law. Despite Plaintiff's claim that Defendant was "served pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure," (id., at 2) service is plainly deficient under California and Federal law because Plaintiff did not serve an authorized agent of Defendant. The Court lacks jurisdiction over Defendant because it has not been served properly. The motion is denied. The Court directs the clerk to deny the entry of default due to improper service of process. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). (lc) |
| Filing 24 Corrected REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Proof of service declaration) (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: Third APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. #22 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. Request for Entry of Default has been forwarded to the assigned Judge. 1) The refiled proof on the defendant, Cable News Network Inc. was made on a Joe - last name unknown. and by email (no confirmation of email delivery) and by certified mail (still no copy of formal executed certified mail receipt signed and dated by agent accepting service. Only postage paid and proof of mailing receipts attached again, however now with additional written information re TRACKING NUMBER, but no formal tracking number document attached.2) Thus clerk is unable to determine the propriety of service on the defendant, a corporation, and it is plaintiffs third attempt. Therefore request has been forwarded to the Judge.. (lc) |
| Filing 22 Third APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit issued summons, #2 Declaration Proof of service) (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. #18 , Second REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. #19 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. Clerked checked docket no. 1, 18, 19 and 20. No executed dated and signed certified mail receipts attached. (lc) |
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham, re Second REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. #19 served on 9/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served Notice)(Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 19 Second REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Proof of service declaration) (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 18 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Cable News Network Inc. filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by plaintiff Jesse Graham, upon Defendant Cable News Network Inc. served on 9/22/2021, answer due 10/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 4. FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by plaintiff Jesse Graham, by Publication upon Defendant Cable News Network Inc. last date of publication 9/22/2021, answer due 10/13/2021. Publication was made in the https://www.law.com/radar/card/jesse-graham-v-cable-news-network-inc-41874981-0/., Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham., Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. as to Cable News Network Inc.., Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #6 , Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form, #16 filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Graham, Jesse) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Summons Request #14 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by October 18, 2021. (smo) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Summons Request #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Other error(s) with document(s): The Blank Summons form was submitted to the Clerk via EDSS. Upon docketing the document as a summons to be issued, clerk found an Executed proof of service of the complaint as 9/14/21. However the Clerk issued the summons on 9/21/21. Filer should file proper proof of service without a Blank Summons as its title page.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (lc) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF JESSE GRAHAM'S APPLICATION FOR PRO SE ELECTRONIC FILING #10 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendant Cable News Network Inc. (Mailing label issued and mailed summons to plaintiff pro se ) (lc) Modified on 9/22/2021 (lc). |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (lc) Modified on 9/21/2021 (lc). Modified on 9/21/2021 (lc). |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Jesse Graham. (lc) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Although Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, i.e., without legal representation, he nonetheless is required to comply with Court orders, the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.3. The Local Rules are available on the Courts website, http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/court-procedures/ local-rules. The Court cannot provide legal advice to any party, including pro se litigants, i.e., parties who are not represented by a lawyer. There is a free "Pro Se Clinic" that can provide information and guidance about many aspects of civil litigation in this Court. The Court notes that a party to this lawsuit does not have a lawyer. Parties in court without a lawyer are called "pro se litigants." These parties often face special challenges in federal court. Public Counsel runs a free Federal Pro Se Clinic where pro se litigants can get information and guidance. The Clinic is located at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (note that the clinic may not be open for in-person appointments during the pandemic). Pro se litigants must call or submit an on-line application to request services as follows: on-line applications can be submitted at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles, or call (213) 385-2977, ext. 270. Pro se litigants may submit documents for filing through the Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) instead of mailing or bringing documents to the Clerk's Office. Only internet access and an e-mail address are required. Documents are submitted in PDF format through an online portal on the Court's website. To access EDSS and for additional information, visit the Court's website at https://apps.cacd.uscourts.gov/edss. Attorneys may not use EDSS to submit documents on behalf of their clients. Attorneys are required by the local rules to file documents electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (Attachments: #1 Form AO120) (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint - (Discovery) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jesse Graham. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Cable News Network Inc. Case assigned to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (Filing fee $ 402 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Jesse Graham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/16/2021: #2 Summons) (et). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jesse Graham v. Cable News Network Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jesse Graham | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cable News Network Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nicolas A Jampol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
