Ryan Artolachipe et al v. Jonathan Brett Allcorn et al
| Ryan Artolachipe, Robert Laich, Bryce MacCharles, Christopher M Tijerina, Cassondra Carper, Raven Evans, Leah Horn, Messiah Johnson, Ashley Nichols and Margaret Romero-Johnson |
| Jonathan Brett Allcorn, Revival Point LLC, Supernatural Man LLC, Gotham Club LLC, Pineapple Products, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07431 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Ryan Artolachipe, Cassondra Carper, Raven Evans, Leah Horn, Messiah Johnson, Robert Laich, Bryce MacCharles, Ashley Nichols, Margaret Romero-Johnson, Christopher M Tijerina. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service for Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(Cintas, Joshua) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Cintas, Joshua) |
Filing 19
Order to Show Cause (LOP) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/9/2021. (smo)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Supernatural Man LLC answer now due 10/22/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Supernatural Man LLC.(Attorney Jeffrey V Dunn added to party Supernatural Man LLC(pty:dft))(Dunn, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Revival Point LLC answer now due 10/22/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Revival Point LLC.(Attorney Jeffrey V Dunn added to party Revival Point LLC(pty:dft))(Dunn, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pineapple Products, Inc. answer now due 10/22/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Pineapple Products, Inc..(Attorney Jeffrey V Dunn added to party Pineapple Products, Inc.(pty:dft))(Dunn, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Gotham Club LLC answer now due 10/22/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Gotham Club LLC.(Attorney Jeffrey V Dunn added to party Gotham Club LLC(pty:dft))(Dunn, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jonathan Brett Allcorn answer now due 10/22/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Jonathan Brett Allcorn.(Attorney Jeffrey V Dunn added to party Jonathan Brett Allcorn(pty:dft))(Dunn, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Supernatural Man LLC answer now due 10/1/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Supernatural Man LLC.(Attorney Daniel Lee Richards added to party Supernatural Man LLC(pty:dft))(Richards, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Revival Point LLC answer now due 10/1/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Revival Point LLC.(Attorney Daniel Lee Richards added to party Revival Point LLC(pty:dft))(Richards, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pineapple Products, Inc. answer now due 10/1/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Pineapple Products, Inc..(Attorney Daniel Lee Richards added to party Pineapple Products, Inc.(pty:dft))(Richards, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Gotham Club LLC answer now due 10/1/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Gotham Club LLC.(Attorney Daniel Lee Richards added to party Gotham Club LLC(pty:dft))(Richards, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jonathan Brett Allcorn answer now due 10/1/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Jonathan Brett Allcorn.(Attorney Daniel Lee Richards added to party Jonathan Brett Allcorn(pty:dft))(Richards, Daniel) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Leah Horn, Robert Laich, Ryan Artolachipe, Raven Evans, Bryce MacCharles, Ashley Nichols, Messiah Johnson, Christopher M Tijerina, Margaret Romero-Johnson and Cassondra Carper in Los Angeles Superior Court on 6/7/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Supernatural Man LLC, identifying Jonathan Brett Allcorn. (Moos, Damian) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Supernatural Man LLC (Moos, Damian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Supernatural Man LLC. (Moos, Damian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21NWCV00359 Receipt No: ACACDC-31996770 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANT Supernatural Man LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16) (Attorney Damian Moos added to party Supernatural Man LLC(pty:dft))(Moos, Damian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
