United States of America v. 154,600.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
$154,600.00 in U.S. Currency and 154,600.00 in U.S. Currency |
2:2021cv07484 |
September 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Margo A Rocconi |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 7 WARRANT for seizure of 154,600.00 in U.S. Currency issued on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (ghap) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (ghap) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Warrant for Seizure on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff United States of America. (Rodgers, Victor) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Rodgers, Victor) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by pl United States of America. (Attorney Victor A. Rodgers, Jr added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Rodgers, Victor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.