Reanna Garcia v. Xerox Corporation et al
Reanna Garcia |
XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation, Paladin Consulting, Inc., Xerox Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2021cv07623 |
September 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
John F Walter |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #19 filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation.(Hearne, Heather) |
Filing 22 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #19 filed by Defendant Paladin Consulting, Inc..(Anderson, Jasmine) |
Filing 21 ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO ALLOW DEFENDANTS ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #20 by Judge John F. Walter. Defendants shall have until November 17, 2021 to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (iv) |
Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Xerox Corporation answer now due 11/17/2021; Paladin Consulting, Inc. answer now due 11/17/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition #19 filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hearne, Heather) |
Filing 19 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff Reanna Garcia (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redlined/highlighted copy)(Reisman, Daniel) |
Filing 18 DECLARATION of Jasmine L. Anderson , Defendant Paladin Consulting, Inc.'s Lead Trial Counsel filed by Defendant Paladin Consulting, Inc.. (Anderson, Jasmine) |
Filing 17 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 6/24/2022 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 7/8/2022 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 7/19/2022 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv) |
Filing 16 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on October 25, 2021 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: February 7, 2022. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: February 11, 2022. (iv) |
Filing 15 STATUS REPORT JOINT STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant Paladin Consulting, Inc.. (Anderson, Jasmine) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation, identifying Xerox Holdings Corporation. (Hearne, Heather) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Heather D. Hearne , Xerox Corporation's Lead Trial Counsel filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation. (Hearne, Heather) |
Filing 12 ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #7 by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint no later than October 20, 2021. (iv) |
Filing 11 DECLARATION of Daniel A Reisman Plaintiff's Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff Reanna Garcia. (Reisman, Daniel) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for October 25, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before October 11, 2021. (iv) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 50, inclusive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jgr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 7 Joint STIPULATION to and Request to Allow Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hearne, Heather) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Paladin Consulting, Inc. identifying GEE Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Anderson, Jasmine) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Paladin Consulting, Inc., Xerox Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Reanna Garcia. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/24/2021 SUBMIITED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Paladin Consulting, Inc.. (Anderson, Jasmine) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV31322 Receipt No: ACACDC-32039944 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Paladin Consulting, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Attorney Jasmine Lynn Anderson added to party Paladin Consulting, Inc.(pty:dft))(Anderson, Jasmine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.