Edi Jaen v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
| Edi Jaen |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America LLC |
| 2:2021cv07629 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Western District of Pennsylvania, 2:21-cv-01500 filed 10/21/2021. (iv) |
| Filing 16 Conditional Transfer Order - 1 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3014, transferring case to USDC, Western District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen, upon Defendant Philips RS North America LLC served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nicole Stauss, authorized agent for CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, agent for service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Arevalo, Kristy) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen, upon Defendant Philips North America LLC served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nicole Stauss, authorized agent for CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, agent for service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Arevalo, Kristy) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Philips RS North America LLC. (twdb) |
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen. (Arevalo, Kristy) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Philips North America LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Koninklijke Philips N.V. (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen. (Arevalo, Kristy) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen. (Arevalo, Kristy) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen. (Arevalo, Kristy) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen, identifying Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC (defendants). (Arevalo, Kristy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32042013 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Edi Jaen. (Attorney Kristy M Arevalo added to party Edi Jaen(pty:pla))(Arevalo, Kristy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
