People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority et al
Plaintiff: People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant: Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority and Stephanie Wiggins
Case Number: 2:2021cv07662
Filed: September 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Mark C Scarsi
2 Judge: Christina A Snyder
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 First STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Stephanie Wiggins filed by Defendants Stephanie Wiggins, Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority.(Attorney William E Weinberger added to party Stephanie Wiggins(pty:dft))(Weinberger, William)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority answer now due 11/29/2021; Stephanie Wiggins answer now due 11/29/2021, filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority.(Attorney William E Weinberger added to party Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority(pty:dft))(Weinberger, William)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., upon Defendant Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority served on 10/12/2021, answer due 11/2/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon George Roqueni - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Strugar, Matthew)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-07662 MCS(MAAx). (rn)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Stephanie Wiggins. (shb)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority. (shb)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #11 . The following error(s) was found: The Summons form to be issued for defendant Stephanie Wiggans is blank. This must be filled out completely so the clerk can issue the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (shb)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request to Stephanie Wiggins)(Strugar, Matthew)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #9 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. Please re-submit with the summons filled out completely. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (shb)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Strugar, Matthew)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., identifying none. (Strugar, Matthew)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Strugar, Matthew)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Strugar, Matthew)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32049217 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Attorney Matthew D Strugar added to party People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.(pty:pla))(Strugar, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew D Strugar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles County Metroplitan Transportation Authority
Represented By: William E Weinberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephanie Wiggins
Represented By: William E Weinberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?