Mitchell and Company, Inc. v. Judicial Council of California et al
Plaintiff: Mitchell and Company, Inc.
Defendant: Judicial Council of California, Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv07732
Filed: September 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, on the Court's own motion, the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Quash Summons set for November 29, 2021, is hereby TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. No appearance will be necessary. This matter is appropriate for resolution without hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15, and will stand submitted on the papers timely filed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 17, 2021 Filing 21 request for remote Zoom hearing appearance filed by Plaintiff Mitchell and Company, Inc. for hearings re: Response in Opposition to Motion, #16 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Quash Summons re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #15 , Response in Support of Motion #18 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order remote Zoom appearance)(Glasser, Frederick)
November 16, 2021 Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Mitchell and Company, Inc., re Response in Support of Motion #18 Complaint, Summons, ADR 2nd set served on Proof of Service 2nd set. (Glasser, Frederick)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: granting #2 Non-Resident Attorney Guiness Ohazuruike APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Mitchell and Company, Inc, designating Glasser, Frederick L as local counsel. (yl)
November 15, 2021 Filing 18 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Quash Summons re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #15 filed by Defendants Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Judicial Council of California. (McCormick, Kevin)
October 28, 2021 Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Mitchell and Company, Inc., re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 corrected POS served on 10/01/2021. (Glasser, Frederick)
October 28, 2021 Filing 16 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Quash Summons re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #15 Opposition and Response filed by Plaintiff Mitchell and Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Proof of Service)(Glasser, Frederick)
October 22, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Quash Summons re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendants Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Judicial Council of California. Motion set for hearing on 11/29/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Declaration of Marcus Gonzalez, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Quash) (Attorney Kevin M McCormick added to party Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin M McCormick added to party Judicial Council of California(pty:dft)) (McCormick, Kevin)
October 15, 2021 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Mitchell and Company Mitchell and Company, Inc., re Response in Opposition to Motion #12 RESPONSE TO OSC served on 10-15-21. (Glasser, Frederick)
October 15, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Mitchell and Company Mitchell and Company, Inc., re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 Personal Service served on 10-1-2021. (Glasser, Frederick)
October 15, 2021 Filing 12 OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiff Mitchell and Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit STATE COURT APPEAL OPINION)(Glasser, Frederick)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. See Order for details. (cch)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. See Order for details. (cch)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff must file a response in writing no later than 4:00 p.m. on October 18, 2021. Plaintiff's failure to respond will result in dismissal of this action. (lom)
September 29, 2021 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Tani G. Cantil Sakauye and Judicial Council of California. (jtil)
September 29, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
September 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
September 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil)
September 28, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Mitchell and Company, Inc. Mitchell and Company, Inc.. (Glasser, Frederick)
September 28, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mitchell and Company, Inc.. (Glasser, Frederick)
September 28, 2021 Filing 2 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Guinness Ohazuruike to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Mitchell and Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32065006) filed by Mitchell and Company, Inc. Mitchell and Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Pro Hac Vice proposed order) (Glasser, Frederick)
September 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32064829 - Fee: $402, filed by Mitchell and Company, Inc. Mitchell and Company, Inc.. (Attorney Frederick L Glasser added to party Mitchell and Company, Inc.(pty:pla))(Glasser, Frederick)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell and Company, Inc. v. Judicial Council of California et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitchell and Company, Inc.
Represented By: Frederick L Glasser
Represented By: Guinness I. Ohazuruike
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judicial Council of California
Represented By: Kevin M McCormick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye
Represented By: Kevin M McCormick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?