Keith Huckaby v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
| Keith Huckaby |
| CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. and Does 1 through 30, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07766 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Otis D Wright |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
REPLY In Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #17 filed by Plaintiff Keith Huckaby. (Berenji, Shadie)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #22 , Notice of Appearance #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
|
|
Filing 22
Second NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Shadie Latae Berenji on behalf of Plaintiff Keith Huckaby (Berenji, Shadie)
|
|
Filing 21
First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Shadie Latae Berenji on behalf of Plaintiff Keith Huckaby (Berenji, Shadie)
|
|
Filing 20
OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #17 filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (Kramer, Jared)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING DEADLINES AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTON TO REMAND #18 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: (1) Defendants Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand shall be filed on or before November 12, 2021; (2) Plaintiff's Reply in support of his Motion to Remand shall be filed on or before November 22, 2021; and (3) the hearing on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is continued to December 6, 2021 at 1:30 PM #17 . (lc)
|
|
Filing 18
Joint STIPULATION to Continue filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kramer, Jared)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Keith Huckaby. Motion set for hearing on 11/29/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Shadie L. Berenji ISO Motion to Remand, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Remand) (Berenji, Shadie)
|
|
Filing 16
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney James H. Hanson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. and designating Christopher C. McNatt, Jr. as local counsel #15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 15
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney James H. Hanson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 10/27/2021, Receipt No. 32222109) filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney James H Hanson added to party CRST Expedited, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney James H Hanson added to party CRST International, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Hanson, James)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jared S. Kramer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. and designating Christopher C. McNatt, Jr. as local counsel #12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles Andrewscavage to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. and designating Christopher C. McNatt, Jr. as local counsel #11 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 12
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jared S. Kramer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32202455) filed by Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B- Admissions, #2 Exhibit C- Certificates of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (McNatt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 11
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles Andrewscavage to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32202282) filed by Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B- Admissions, #2 Exhibit C- Certificates of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (McNatt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for December 6, 2021 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc..(McNatt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc., Does 1 through 30, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Keith Huckaby. Filed in State Court on 8/9/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (McNatt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc., identifying Keith Huckaby, CRST Expedited, Inc. d/b/a CRST the Transportation Solution, CRST International Holdings, LLC, Hillcrest Holdings, Inc.. (McNatt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (McNatt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV29128 Receipt No: ACACDC-32072933 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., CRST International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Christopher Chad McNatt, Jr added to party CRST Expedited, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Chad McNatt, Jr added to party CRST International, Inc.(pty:dft))(McNatt, Christopher)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
