Keitonia Douglas v. Veros Credit, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Keitonia Douglas
Defendant: Veros Credit, LLC and Does I-X John
Case Number: 2:2021cv07782
Filed: September 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Consuelo B Marshall
Referring Judge: Margo A Rocconi
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
November 1, 2021 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Veros Credit, LLC answer now due 12/3/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Veros Credit, LLC.(Attorney Loren W Coe added to party Veros Credit, LLC(pty:dft))(Coe, Loren)
October 14, 2021 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Keitonia Douglas, upon Defendant Veros Credit, LLC served on 10/14/2021, answer due 11/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Veros Credit, LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Thompson, Russell)
October 1, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Veros Credit, LLC. (jtil)
September 30, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
September 30, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (jtil)
September 30, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Keitonia Douglas, (Thompson, Russell)
September 30, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Keitonia Douglas. (Thompson, Russell)
September 30, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Keitonia Douglas. (Thompson, Russell)
September 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32075481 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Keitonia Douglas. (Attorney Russell S Thompson, IV added to party Keitonia Douglas(pty:pla))(Thompson, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keitonia Douglas v. Veros Credit, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keitonia Douglas
Represented By: Russell S Thompson, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Veros Credit, LLC
Represented By: Scott J Hyman
Represented By: Loren W Coe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does I-X John
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?