Phillip Walker v. ARCP Uo Portfolio II, LP et al
| Phillip Walker |
| ARCP Uo Portfolio II, LP and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv07783 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
CIVIL TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 16 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson - The initial status conference scheduled for 11/29/2021 at 3:00 p.m. is vacated and off-calendar. The Court bifurcates the state and federal ADA claims. A court trial on the ADA claim is set for 03/29/2022 at 9:00 a.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 Defendant's Request to Video Appearance at Status Conference (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Orlick, Martin) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 11/29/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant ARCP Uo Portfolio II, LP (Orlick, Martin) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant ARCP Uo Portfolio II, LP.(Attorney Martin H Orlick added to party ARCP Uo Portfolio II, LP(pty:dft))(Orlick, Martin) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Phillip Walker, upon Defendant ARCP Uo Portfolio II, LP served on 10/4/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon C T Corporation system, John Montijo - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Steven, Laura) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. In light of the foregoing, the parties are ORDERED to issue a joint status report at least 7 days prior to the initial status conference. In that status report, Defendant should describe the measures it has taken to investigate and/or remedy the alleged barriers. If Defendant implemented remedial measures, Plaintiff should state their position regarding those measures. Both parties should state whether and when they intend to move for summary judgment. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 9
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant ARCP Uo Portfolio II, LP. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Phillip Walker, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Phillip Walker. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Phillip Walker. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32075859 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Phillip Walker. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Phillip Walker(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
