Marissa Hernandez v. Michael Ly et al
| Marissa Hernandez |
| Michael Ly, Rebecca Estrada, Griselda Subias, Guadalupe Garibay, Joseph Santoyo, Annabel Martinez-Navaro, Maria Borroto, Laurie Pruitt and Doe Hernandez |
| 2:2021cv07858 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER (1) SUBMITTING AND VACATING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION; (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND (3) DEFERRING RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: granting in part #8 MOTION for Reconsideration #8 . 1. Plaintiff's Motion is granted to the extent it seeks leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #5 filed by plaintiff Marissa Hernandez. Motion set for hearing on 12/6/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (mrgo) |
|
Filing 7
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (See attached document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff Marissa Hernandez ("Plaintiff"), who is appearing pro se, has sent an email to the Court's Deputy Clerk in which she seek advice on how to proceed in this action. Neither the Court nor the Deputy Clerk can provide legal advice to a litigant. Additionally, Local Rule 83-2.5 provides: Attorneys or parties to any action or proceeding shall refrain from writing letters to the judge, sending e-mail messages to the judge, making telephone calls to chambers, or otherwise communicating with a judge in a pending matter unless opposing counsel is present. All matters must be called to a judge's attention by appropriate application or motion filed in compliance with these Local Rules. (SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED (see comments above). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. (lom)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Marissa Hernandez. (esa) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Marissa Hernandez. (esa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against defendants Maria Borroto, Rebecca Estrada, Guadalupe Garibay(an individual), Doe Hernandez, Michael Ly, Annabel Martinez-Navaro, Laurie Pruitt, Joseph Santoyo, Griselda Subias Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, filed by plaintiff Marissa Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 CV 71) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
