Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP v. Cal Plate, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Manfield Partnership #2 LP and Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP
Defendant: Cal Plate, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv07860
Filed: October 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP. correcting Proof of Service (subsequent documents), #11 (Adriance, Vanessa)
November 18, 2021 Filing 14 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Adriance, Vanessa)
November 18, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Vanessa C Adriance on behalf of Plaintiff Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP (Adriance, Vanessa)
November 16, 2021 Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP(Attorney Vanessa C Adriance added to party Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP(pty:pla))(Adriance, Vanessa)
November 1, 2021 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP, re Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #5 and Blank Statement of Consent served on November 1, 2022. (Callahan, Elizabeth)
October 29, 2021 Filing 10 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr)
October 26, 2021 Filing 9 STATEMENT of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Cal Plate, Inc. (Wilms, Nancy)
October 22, 2021 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP. upon Cal Plate, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/1/2021, answer due 11/30/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Nancy M. Wilms. (Callahan, Elizabeth)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (hr)
October 4, 2021 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Cal Plate, Inc. (lh)
October 4, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh)
October 1, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff, identifying Manfield Partnership #2 LP and Cal Plate, Inc. (Callahan, Elizabeth) NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Manfield Partnership #2 LP; Cal Plate, Inc.. (Callahan, Elizabeth)
October 1, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Manfield Partnership #2 LP. (Callahan, Elizabeth)
October 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Manfield Partnership #2 LP. (Callahan, Elizabeth)
October 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32087863 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Manfield Partnership #2 LP. (Attorney Elizabeth Cherise Callahan added to party Manfield Partnership #2 LP(pty:pla))(Callahan, Elizabeth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP v. Cal Plate, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manfield Partnership #2 LP
Represented By: Elizabeth Cherise Callahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manfield Partnership No. 2 LP
Represented By: Elizabeth Cherise Callahan
Represented By: Vanessa C Adriance
Represented By: Adam Paul Baas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cal Plate, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?