Edmond Alvarez et al v. Safelite Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Edmond Alvarez and Thomas Newell
Defendant: Safelite Group, Inc., Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv07874
Filed: October 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiffs Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell.. (Boyadjian, Aram)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #14 filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Troy Hannum, #2 Declaration of Michael Shoenfelt, #3 Declaration of Brendan Burke)(Shoenfelt, Michael)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or in the alternative stay case filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 1/10/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher M. Lapidus, #2 Proposed Order) (Shoenfelt, Michael)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES' STIPULATIONTO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE #21 by Judge Otis D. Wright, IIL The hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion is continued to January 10, 2022 at 1:30 PM #14 ; Defendant's Response: November 29, 2021; Plaintiff's reply: December 20, 2021. (lc)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Motion to Remand from December 6, 2021 to January 10, 2022 filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael J. Shoenfelt, #2 Proposed Order)(Shoenfelt, Michael)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Shoenfelt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc. and designating Christopher M. Lapidus as local counsel #16 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam J. Rocco to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc. and designating Christopher M. Lapidus as local counsel #15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Adam J. Rocco #17 Incorrect pdf image attached due to CM shifting of pdf image to another image prior to attachment. Order will be redocketed. (lc)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam J. Rocco to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc. and designating Christopher M. Lapidus as local counsel #15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Shoenfelt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32259891) filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lapidus, Christopher)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam J. Rocco to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32259504) filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lapidus, Christopher)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiffs Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell. Motion set for hearing on 12/6/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aram Boyadjian, #2 [Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Remand) (Boyadjian, Aram)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFFS Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell, (Boyadjian, Aram)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for December 6, 2021 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Jonathan Kramer counsel for Plaintiffs Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell. Adding Daniel J. Kramer as counsel of record for PLAINTIFFS for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by PLAINTIFFS Edmond Alvarez and Thomas Newell. (Attorney Daniel Jonathan Kramer added to party Edmond Alvarez(pty:pla), Attorney Daniel Jonathan Kramer added to party Thomas Newell(pty:pla))(Kramer, Daniel)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aram Boyadjian counsel for Plaintiffs Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell. Adding ARAM BOYADJIAN as counsel of record for PLAINTIFFS for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by PLAINTIFFS Edmond Alvarez and Thomas Newell. (Attorney Aram Boyadjian added to party Edmond Alvarez(pty:pla), Attorney Aram Boyadjian added to party Thomas Newell(pty:pla))(Boyadjian, Aram)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc., re Notice of Related Case(s), #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 served on October 4, 2021. (Lapidus, Christopher)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/28/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2) (ghap)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/25/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell, upon Defendant Safelite Fulfillment, Inc. served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens-c/o CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 3) (ghap)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell, upon Defendant Safelite Glass Corporation served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens-c/o CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 3) (ghap)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Edmond Alvarez, Thomas Newell, upon Defendant Safelite Group, Inc. served on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Taalib Noble- Employee in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 3) (ghap)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc.. Related Case(s): 20-CV-05952-MMC; 3:21-CV-00191-MMC; 20-cv-02076; CGC-21-588898; and 21GDCV00833 (Lapidus, Christopher)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc., identifying Belron S.A. (Lapidus, Christopher)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation, Safelite Group, Inc.. (Lapidus, Christopher)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV23779 Receipt No: ACACDC-32088619 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Group, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Attorney Christopher Lapidus added to party Safelite Fulfillment, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Lapidus added to party Safelite Glass Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher Lapidus added to party Safelite Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lapidus, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edmond Alvarez et al v. Safelite Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edmond Alvarez
Represented By: Edwin Aiwazian
Represented By: Aram Boyadjian
Represented By: Daniel Jonathan Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Newell
Represented By: Edwin Aiwazian
Represented By: Aram Boyadjian
Represented By: Daniel Jonathan Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Safelite Group, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Lapidus
Represented By: Adam J. Rocco
Represented By: Cory D. Catignani
Represented By: Michael J. Shoenfelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Safelite Fulfillment, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Lapidus
Represented By: Adam J. Rocco
Represented By: Cory D. Catignani
Represented By: Michael J. Shoenfelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Safelite Glass Corporation
Represented By: Christopher Lapidus
Represented By: Adam J. Rocco
Represented By: Cory D. Catignani
Represented By: Michael J. Shoenfelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?