Florencio Pacleb v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC et al
| Florencio Pacleb |
| Radius Global Solutions, LLC and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07897 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Radius Global Solutions, LLC, identifying NGI Acquisitions LLC. (Ohashi, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Radius Global Solutions, LLC. (Ohashi, Kenneth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA, County of Ventura, case number 56-2021-00557636-CL NP VTA Receipt No: ACACDC-32091993 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Radius Global Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Documents, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Kenneth Akira Ohashi added to party Radius Global Solutions, LLC(pty:dft))(Ohashi, Kenneth) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Radius Global Solutions, LLC, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Florencio Pacleb.(filed in state court 8/30/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
