Israel Maldonado Ramirez v. Exsecutive Director et al
Israel Maldonado Ramirez |
Exsecutive Director and Doctor Joel Unknown |
2:2021cv07924 |
October 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Dolly M Gee |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). Further ORDER an Initial Partial Filing Fee of $5.00 to be paid. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, ORDERING Letter submitted by Plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez received on 11/1/2021 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 83-2.5 No letters to the judge. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez. (ghap) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Exsecutive Director, Joel Unknown pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V Castillo., filed by plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.