Kun Nam Lee v. Proland Management
| Kum Nam Lee |
| Proland Management |
| 2:2021cv07979 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND by Judge Cormac J. Carney. DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number. re Complaint - (Referred) #1 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
|
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 21-56226 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #7 as to Petitioner Kum Nam Lee. (hr) |
| Filing 8 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to Plaintiff Kum Nam Lee, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #7 (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Petitioner Kum Nam Lee. Appeal of Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #4 Filed On: 10/08/2021; Entered On: 10/08/2021; Filing fee $ 505 Billed. (car) |
| Filing 6 FOR COURT USE ONLY: STATISTICAL CORRECTION terminating #2 Notice of Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93), Re #4 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) RE: FILING FEE. (dml) [Correcting Court Entry No. 5] (dml) |
| Filing 5 FOR COURT USE ONLY: STATISTICAL CORRECTION deferring ruling on #2 Notice of Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93), Re #4 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) RE: FILING FEE. (dml) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) RE: FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: On October 7, 2021, the Clerk issued a notice that Plaintiff had neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 2. The case cannot proceed until Plaintiff pays the filing fees or submits an IFP request. Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fees or submit an IFP request by November 8, 2021. See Order for details. (Attachments: #1 Form CV-60) (dml)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendant Proland Management Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, filed by Petitioner Kum Nam Lee. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kun Nam Lee v. Proland Management | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kum Nam Lee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Proland Management | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
