Edward Aguilar v. Harbor Distributing, LLC et al
Edward Aguilar |
Harbor Distributing, LLC, Juan Ramirez, David Figueroa and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2021cv08037 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
John E McDermott |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Receipt of Order of Remand filed. (mrgo) |
Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. (lom) |
Filing 9 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE via ZOOM held before Judge Percy Anderson. The Court remands this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV30665. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Pat Cuneo (video). (lom) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Percy Anderson Status Conference via ZOOM is set for 10/8/2021 at 04:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa) |
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants David Figueroa, Harbor Distributing, LLC, Juan Ramirez, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 served on October 8, 2021. (Daughters, Carrie) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants David Figueroa, Harbor Distributing, LLC, Juan Ramirez, identifying 1. Plaintiff Edward Aguilar 2. Defendant Juan Ramirez 3. Defendant David Figueroa 4. Defendant Harbor Distributing, L.L.C. 5. Reyes Holdings, L.L.C.. (Daughters, Carrie) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants David Figueroa, Harbor Distributing, LLC, Juan Ramirez. (Daughters, Carrie) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV30665 Receipt No: ACACDC-32124307 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants David Figueroa, Juan Ramirez, Harbor Distributing, LLC. (Attorney Carrie Lynn Daughters added to party David Figueroa(pty:dft), Attorney Carrie Lynn Daughters added to party Harbor Distributing, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Carrie Lynn Daughters added to party Juan Ramirez(pty:dft))(Daughters, Carrie) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendants David Figueroa, Harbor Distributing, LLC, Juan Ramirez. (filed in state court 10/7/2021, submitted as document 1, p. 143)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, David Figueroa, Harbor Distributing, LLC, Juan Ramirez, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Edward Aguilar. (filed in state court 8/18/2021, submitted as document 1, p. 34) (esa) |
COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Defendant Edward Aguilar, upon Defendant Harbor Distributing, LLC served on 9/9/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (submitted as document 1, p. 7) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.