Janne Kouri v. FedEx Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Janne Kouri
Defendant: FedEx Corporation, DOES, Does 1-25, inclusive and Federal Express Corporation
Case Number: 2:2021cv08066
Filed: October 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2021 Filing 27 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Michael Sean Frey counsel for Defendant Federal Express Corporation. Changing Address to Federal Express Corporation, 2601 Main Street, Suite 340, Irvine, CA 92614. Changing e-mail to michael.frey@fedex.com. Filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation. (Frey, Michael)
November 29, 2021 Filing 26 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/31/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 1/14/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti)
November 29, 2021 Filing 25 DISCLOSURE Federal Express Corporation's Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation (Frey, Michael)
November 29, 2021 Filing 24 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #23 Answer and Affirmative Defenses of Defendant Federal Express Corporation to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation.(Attorney Michael Sean Frey added to party Federal Express Corporation(pty:dft))(Frey, Michael)
November 18, 2021 Filing 23 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Federal Express Corporation amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri(Miller, Jonathan)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #19 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Plaintiff, JANNE KOURI is granted leave to amend his First Amended Complaint. Defendant's response shall be due on November 29, 2021. The First Amended Complaint shall be e-filed within three (3) days of this Order. (iv)
November 16, 2021 Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Lodging, Attachment No. 1 [20-1]. The following error(s) was/were found: Notice of Lodging Attachment No. 1 lacks case number and judge's initials In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm)
November 12, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re: PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re Stipulation to Amend/Correct #19 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Proposed First Amended Complaint)(Miller, Jonathan)
November 12, 2021 Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Red-Lined First Amended Complaint), #2 Proposed Order)(Miller, Jonathan)
October 25, 2021 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri, re: Court's ADA Packet served on October 21, 2021. (Miller, Jonathan)
October 25, 2021 Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri, upon Defendant FedEx Corporation served on 10/21/2021, answer due 11/12/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Phoebe Omolo, Intake Specialist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Miller, Jonathan)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin Sweet to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janne Kouri, designating Jonathan Miller as local counsel #14 . (iv)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey Sanderson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janne Kouri, designating Jonathan Miller as local counsel #13 . (iv)
October 18, 2021 Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin J. Sweet to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janne Kouri (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32172517) filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Miller, Jonathan)
October 18, 2021 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey Lucas Sanderson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Janne Kouri (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32172406) filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Miller, Jonathan)
October 14, 2021 Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
October 13, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney J Luke Sanderson. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
October 13, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin J Sweet. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
October 13, 2021 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant FedEx Corporation. (car)
October 13, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
October 13, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
October 13, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car)
October 9, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri, identifying Janne Kouri and FedEx Corporation. (Miller, Jonathan)
October 9, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri. (Miller, Jonathan)
October 9, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri. (Miller, Jonathan)
October 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32129149 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Janne Kouri. (Attorney Jonathan D Miller added to party Janne Kouri(pty:pla))(Miller, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Janne Kouri v. FedEx Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janne Kouri
Represented By: Jonathan D Miller
Represented By: Jonathan D. Miller
Represented By: Jordan Tyler Porter
Represented By: Benjamin J. Sweet
Represented By: Jeffrey Lucas Sanderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation
Represented By: Michael Sean Frey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?