Mark McKenna v. Good Worldwide Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark McKenna
Defendant: Good Worldwide Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv08072
Filed: October 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Mark McKenna. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Sanders, Craig)
November 11, 2021 Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Good Worldwide Inc. answer now due 12/17/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Good Worldwide Inc..(Attorney Sevag Demirjian added to party Good Worldwide Inc.(pty:dft))(Demirjian, Sevag)
October 14, 2021 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mark McKenna, upon Defendant Good Worldwide Inc. served on 10/13/2021, answer due 11/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lyanne Gares; Managing Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
October 12, 2021 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Good Worldwide Inc. (et)
October 12, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
October 12, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
October 12, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et)
October 11, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mark McKenna, identifying Sanders Law Group, Craig B. Sanders, Good Worldwide Inc.. (Sanders, Craig)
October 11, 2021 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Mark McKenna. (Sanders, Craig)
October 11, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mark McKenna. (Sanders, Craig)
October 11, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mark McKenna. (Sanders, Craig)
October 11, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32129977 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Mark McKenna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Mark McKenna(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mark McKenna v. Good Worldwide Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark McKenna
Represented By: Craig B Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Good Worldwide Inc.
Represented By: Sevag Demirjian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?