Evi Quaid v. Gerard Fox et al
| Evi Quaid |
| Gerard Fox, Lauren Green and Does 1-50 |
| 2:2021cv08116 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Alka Sagar |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Mail Returned addressed to Evi Quaid re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, #11 (mrgo) |
| Filing 17 Mail Returned addressed to Evi Quaid re Order #8 (mrgo) |
| Filing 16 Mail Returned addressed to Evi Quaid re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 (mrgo) |
| Filing 15 Mail Returned addressed to Evi Quaid re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form, #10 (mrgo) |
| Filing 14 Mail Returned addressed to Evi Quaid re Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #6 (mrgo) |
| Filing 13 Mail Returned addressed to Evi Quaid re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 (mrgo) |
| Filing 12 Mail Returned addressed to Evi Quaid re Order #9 (mrgo) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: re: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . The Court is in receipt of the Complaint filed by plaintiff Evi Quaid (Plaintiff), who is appearing pro se. Plaintiffs Complaint contains claims for malpractice against her former attorneys. The Court dismisses Plaintiffs Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A district court may, and should, grant leave to amend when it appears that subject matter jurisdiction may exist, even though the complaint inadequately alleges jurisdiction. See28 U.S.C. 1653; Trentacosta v. Frontier Pacific Aircraft Industries, Inc., 813 F.2d 1553, 1555 (9th Cir. 1987). Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend the Complaint to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, if any, is to be filed by November 8, 2021. The failure to file a First Amended Complaint by that date or to adequatelyallege the basis for the Courts jurisdiction may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for more information. (shb)
|
| Filing 10 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER DOCKET ENTRY NO. 10]RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: REQUEST for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case #3 by Clerk of Court. The document is stricken. No proposed order per L.R. 524.1. (mrgo) Modified on 10/18/2021 (mrgo). |
|
Filing 9
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. See order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: REQUEST for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case #3 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (kss) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Evi Quaid. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Evi Quaid, (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, Gerard Fox, Lauren Green. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar.(Filing fee $ 402 PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Evi Quaid. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2021: #2 Summons) (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
