Arturo Navarro v. Gruma Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Arturo Navarro
Defendant: Gruma Corporation and Gruma Azteca, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv08172
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Referring Judge: Karen L Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2022 Filing 40 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV32920, acknowledged on 2/7/2022. (iv)
January 31, 2022 Filing 39 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's Motion #27 is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion is denied as to fees and costs. The above-captioned action shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (iv)
January 20, 2022 Filing 37 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Arturo Navarro.. (Crosner, Zachary)
November 29, 2021 Filing 36 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. On the court's own motion, the Motion to Dismiss #18 and Motion to Remand #27 , currently set for hearing on December 2, 2021, are taken off calendar and placed under submission. No appearances are required on that date. The court may order further briefing or other proceedings, at any time, as appropriate. Order to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 18, 2021 Filing 35 REPLY in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Arturo Navarro. (Attachments: #1 Response to Defendant's Objections, #2 Proof of Service)(Serb, Jamie)
November 18, 2021 Filing 34 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF ANNA K. WALTHER re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration #18 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan)
November 18, 2021 Filing 33 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration #18 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan)
November 16, 2021 Filing 32 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Association of Counsel #31 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
November 15, 2021 Filing 31 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Jamie Serb on behalf of Plaintiff Arturo Navarro. Filed by Plaintiff Arturo Navarro (Attorney Jamie K Serb added to party Arturo Navarro(pty:pla))(Serb, Jamie)
November 12, 2021 Filing 30 Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #27 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dan Forman in Opposition to Motion to Remand, #2 Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Anna K. Walther, #3 Proof of Service)(Forman, Dan)
November 10, 2021 Filing 29 Opposition to Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, or In The Alternative, To Transfer Venue And To Stay Action Pending Arbitration Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration #18 filed by Plaintiff Arturo Navarro. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Anna Walther, #2 Exhibit Exhibits 1 to 4, #3 Proof of Service)(Crosner, Zachary)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/20/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 2/3/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
November 4, 2021 Filing 27 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by ARTURO NAVARRO Arturo Navarro. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REMAND AND FOR SANCTIONS, #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF ANNA K.WALTHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #3 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER RE. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND AND FOR SANCTIONS) (Crosner, Zachary)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Motion to Remand Case #24 , for the following reasons: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. (iv)
November 4, 2021 Filing 25 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Remand #24 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv)
November 3, 2021 Filing 24 **STRICKEN** NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by ARTURO NAVARRO, Arturo Navarro. Motion set for hearing on 12/3/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS OF AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REMAND AND FOR SANCTIONS, #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF ANNA K. WALTHER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #3 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER RE. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND AND FOR SANCTIONS) (Crosner, Zachary) Modified on 11/4/2021 Per Order #26 (iv).
November 2, 2021 Filing 23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proposed Order #22 . The following error(s) was/were found: This document is tendered for the judges approval and should have been submitted as a separate PDF attachment to the Notice of Lodging. Correct Event- Civil Events - Other Filings - Notices- Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv)
November 1, 2021 Filing 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS GRUMA CORPORATION AND GRUMA AZTECA INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO TRANSFER VENUE AND TO STAY ACTION PENDING ARBITRATION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration #18 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan)
November 1, 2021 Filing 21 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration #18 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Forman, Dan)
November 1, 2021 Filing 20 DECLARATION of Dan M. Forman in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration #18 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Forman, Dan)
November 1, 2021 Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration #18 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan)
November 1, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case based on Improper Venue, or in the alternative, to Transfer Venue and Stay Action Pending Arbitration filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Forman, Dan)
October 26, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: See L.R. 8-3 Response to Initial Complaint for format. Attorney's text entry is not the same as the attached document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom)
October 25, 2021 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Gruma Azteca, Inc. answer now due 11/1/2021; Gruma Corporation answer now due 11/1/2021, filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc.; Gruma Corporation.(Forman, Dan)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S)by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Notice (Other) #13 , for the following reasons: For the reasons stated on the Notice of Deficiencies #14 . Document shall be refiled with actual due date stated in document. (lom)
October 22, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document is titled Notice of Agreement to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading, however the event for Stipulation should be used to properly update defendants response deadline. Civil Events -Other Filings -Stipulations - Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv)
October 21, 2021 Filing 13 STRICKEN, see docket entry no. 15 - NOTICE OF AGREEMENT TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan) Modified on 10/25/2021 (lom).
October 18, 2021 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation, re Generic Text Only Entry, 11 Initial Standing Order (FMO) served on 10/18/2021. (Forman, Dan)
October 18, 2021 Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 15, 2021 Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
October 15, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
October 15, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (jtil)
October 14, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Arturo Navarro in Los Angeles Superior Court on 10/14/2021, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil)
October 14, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation, re Declaration #3 , Declaration #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #6 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Declaration #4 served on October 14, 2021. (Forman, Dan)
October 14, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation, identifying Arturo Navarro, Gruma Corporation, Gruma Azteca, Inc.. (Forman, Dan)
October 14, 2021 Filing 5 DECLARATION of Dan Burke re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan)
October 14, 2021 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Horatio Gaitan re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Forman, Dan)
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Dan M. Forman re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Forman, Dan)
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Forman, Dan)
October 14, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV32920 Receipt No: CCACDC-32150497 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Gruma Azteca, Inc., Gruma Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Assignment, #5 Notice of Case Management Conference, #6 Notice of Appearance, #7 Proof of Service, #8 Proof of Service, #9 Proof of Service of Summons, #10 Proof of Service of Summons) (Attorney Dan M Forman added to party Gruma Azteca, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Dan M Forman added to party Gruma Corporation(pty:dft))(Forman, Dan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arturo Navarro v. Gruma Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arturo Navarro
Represented By: Anna Katrina Walther
Represented By: Blake R Jones
Represented By: Michael R Crosner
Represented By: Zachary Crosner
Represented By: Jamie K Serb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gruma Corporation
Represented By: Dan M Forman
Represented By: Linda Wang
Represented By: Dan Forman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gruma Azteca, Inc.
Represented By: Dan M Forman
Represented By: Linda Wang
Represented By: Dan Forman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?