Jorge Pedraza v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Jorge Pedraza
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 2:2021cv08174
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Tina Naicker added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Naicker, Tina)
November 16, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints -> Service of S/C Returned Executed as to USA. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (see document for details) (hr)
November 12, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by plaintiff Jorge Pedraza. as to Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Proof)(Drake, Erika)
October 15, 2021 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (et)
October 15, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et)
October 14, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Jorge Pedraza, (Drake, Erika)
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jorge Pedraza. (Drake, Erika)
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jorge Pedraza. (Drake, Erika)
October 14, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32150771 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Jorge Pedraza. (Attorney Erika Drake added to party Jorge Pedraza(pty:pla))(Drake, Erika)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jorge Pedraza v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Pedraza
Represented By: Erika Drake
Represented By: Roger David Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Tina Naicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?