Monica Briseno v. Luke Charles Strode et al
Plaintiff: Monica Briseno
Defendant: Luke Charles Strode and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 2:2021cv08187
Filed: October 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2021 Filing 10 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21SMUD00547, acknowledged on 10/22/2021. (iv)
October 19, 2021 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REMANDING ACTION AND DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, forthwith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs is DENIED as moot. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. (iv)
October 18, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa)
October 18, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
October 18, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa)
October 15, 2021 Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by defendant Luke Charles Strode. (esa)
October 15, 2021 Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by defendant Luke Charles Strode. (esa)
October 15, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, case number 21SMUD00547 with conformed copies of summons and complaint (see p. 5).Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin, discovery to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, filed by defendant Luke Charles Strode. (Attachments: #1 CV 71) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monica Briseno v. Luke Charles Strode et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Briseno
Represented By: Lane M Nussbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luke Charles Strode
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?