Elena Zadouri v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
| Elena Zadouri |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Long-Term Disability Insurance Plan and Does 1 to 10, Inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08194 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Steve Kim |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets an in-person Scheduling Conference for 1/14/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. The parties shall file a joint Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/4/2022. (vcr)
|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, identifying The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"); Prudential Financial, Inc.. (James, Jason) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(De Bautista, Kristin) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. LONG- TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN #11 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN is dismissed from this action without prejudice, with the parties to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs directly related to the instant Stipulation to Dismiss the Plan and the dismissal of the plan. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Long-Term Disability Insurance Plan filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Kristin Kyle De Bautista added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(De Bautista, Kristin) |
|
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America answer now due 12/9/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(Attorney Jason A James added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(James, Jason) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Long-Term Disability Insurance Plan, The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elena Zadouri, (Zietz, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Elena Zadouri. (Zietz, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Elena Zadouri. (Zietz, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32157712 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Elena Zadouri. (Attorney Kevin M Zietz added to party Elena Zadouri(pty:pla))(Zietz, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
