Cervantes Nieto v. HD Supply Management, Inc.
Nabor Cervantes Nieto |
HD Supply Management, Inc., Jesse Quintanilla, Rubin Doe and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive |
2:2021cv08201 |
October 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Karen L Stevenson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV32877, acknowledged on 11/30/2021. (gk) |
Filing 17 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012. (bm) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. All pending dates and deadlines are VACATED. (see document for further details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) |
Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc... (Scherwin, Todd) |
Filing 14 REPLY PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANT HD SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, INC.S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REMAND filed by Plaintiff Nabor Cervantes Nieto. (Lipeles, Kevin) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc.to Order to Show Cause, #12 re Remand (Platt, Taylor) |
Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Because the possibility of cognizable claims against Quintanilla or Ruben would mean the Court lacks jurisdiction, HD Supply is hereby ordered to show cause by November 2, 2021 why the Court should not remand the action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (iv) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/19/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2021 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 10/12/2021, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Nabor Cervantes Nieto in Los Angeles Superior Court on 9/7/2021, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc.. (Scherwin, Todd) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc. identifying HD Supply Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Scherwin, Todd) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc., (Scherwin, Todd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc.. (Scherwin, Todd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV32877 Receipt No: ACACDC-32159737 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant HD Supply Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dan McDevitt, #2 Declaration of Christopher A. Gelpi, #3 Exhibit A to Dec of Christopher A. Gelpi, #4 Exhibit B to Dec of Christopher A. Gelpi, #5 Exhibit C to Dec of Christopher A. Gelpi, #6 Exhibit D to Dec of Christopher A. Gelpi) (Attorney Todd B Scherwin added to party HD Supply Management, Inc.(pty:dft))(Scherwin, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.