Kimberly Cantin v. County of Santa Barbara et al
Kimberly Cantin |
County of Santa Barbara, William Brown and Does 1-20, inclusive |
2:2021cv08253 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Mark C Scarsi |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants William Brown(in his individual ), William Brown(official capacity as Sheriff-Coroner of Santa Barbara County), County of Santa Barbara. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Kimberly Cantin, (Cappello, A) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Cantin. (Cappello, A) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Cantin. (Cappello, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32171599 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Cantin. (Attorney A Barry Cappello added to party Kimberly Cantin(pty:pla))(Cappello, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.