Jaclyn Maria Starling Dixon v. David Raymond Dixon, Jr., et al
Plaintiff: JACLYN MARIA STARLING DIXON
Defendant: DAVID RAYMOND DIXON, David Raymond Dixon, Jr. and Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2021cv08257
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE Notice of Notice to State Court Clerk re Removal of Entire Action to Federal Court filed by Defendant David Raymond Dixon, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to State Court re Removal to Federal Court)(Jew, Christopher)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/27/2021. Status Conference set for 1/3/2022 at 9:00 am. (sw)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
October 19, 2021 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, identifying Renihard Stebner; Blake and Mariah Littauer;Julio Gonzalez; Jon and Mehridith Venverloh; David Nolen; Michael and Rachel Marron; Brian and Morgan Buchek; Luke Beebe;David R. Dixon, Sr. and Easter Bunny Dixon; Pamela Pennington. (Attorney Christopher Charles Jew added to party Does(pty:dft))(Jew, Christopher)
October 19, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa)
October 19, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa)
October 19, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
October 19, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa)
October 18, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants David Raymond Dixon, Jr, Does, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Jaclyn Maria Starling Dixon. (filed in state court 9/8/2021, submitted as document 3, p. 9) (esa)
October 18, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Jaclyn Maria Starling Dixon, upon Defendant David Raymond Dixon, Jr served on 9/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon David Raymond Dixon, Jr., defendant, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 9/28/2021, submitted as document 3, p. 28) (esa)
October 18, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant David Raymond Dixon, Jr. (filed in state court 10/15/2021, submitted as document 3, p. 31)(esa)
October 18, 2021 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Christopher C. Jew re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant DAVID RAYMOND DIXON. (Jew, Christopher)
October 18, 2021 Filing 2 * CIVIL COVER SHEET * filed as NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV33152 with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 10/14/2021, receipt number 32172915), filed by Defendant DAVID RAYMOND DIXON.(Jew, Christopher) Modified on 10/19/2021 (esa).
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV33152 Receipt No: ACACDC-32172915 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff DAVID RAYMOND DIXON. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Decl of D. Dixon ISO Removal of Civil Action - REDACTED) (Attorney Christopher Charles Jew added to party DAVID RAYMOND DIXON(pty:dft))(Jew, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jaclyn Maria Starling Dixon v. David Raymond Dixon, Jr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JACLYN MARIA STARLING DIXON
Represented By: Andrew B Brettler
Represented By: Jake Anthony Camara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID RAYMOND DIXON
Represented By: Christopher Charles Jew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Raymond Dixon, Jr.
Represented By: Christopher Charles Jew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Represented By: Christopher Charles Jew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?