Rolloco Holdings, Inc. et al v. Baker and Hostetler, LLP
Rolloco Holdings, Inc., Cathy Rollo and Tony Rollo |
Baker and Hostetler, LLP |
2:2021cv08319 |
October 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Charles F Eick |
Sheri Pym |
Otis D Wright |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Granting Stipulation to Stay Case #13 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendant Baker and Hostetler, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Tara Renee Burd added to party Baker and Hostetler, LLP(pty:dft))(Burd, Tara) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by Plaintiffs Cathy Rollo, Tony Rollo, Rolloco Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mader, Christopher) |
Filing 12 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Rolloco Holdings, Inc., Tony Rollo, Cathy Rollo, upon Defendant Baker and Hostetler, LLP acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/18/2021, answer due 12/9/2021. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Tara Burd, Counsel for Defendant. (Mader, Christopher) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Baker and Hostetler, LLP. (twdb) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Cathy Rollo, Tony Rollo, Rolloco Holdings, Inc.. (Mader, Christopher) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:16-CV-02334 JGB (SPx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge Otis D. Wright, II to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-08319 JGB (SPx). Signed by Judge Jesus G. Bernal (esa) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Mader, Christopher) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Cathy Rollo, Tony Rollo, Rolloco Holdings, Inc.. (Mader, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32186919 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Rolloco Holdings, Inc., Tony Rollo, Cathy Rollo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex. C to Complaint) (Attorney Christopher Mader added to party Cathy Rollo(pty:pla), Attorney Christopher Mader added to party Tony Rollo(pty:pla), Attorney Christopher Mader added to party Rolloco Holdings, Inc.(pty:pla))(Mader, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.