Wanda Lanier v. Safway Atlantic, LLC et al
| Wanda Lanier |
| Safway Atlantic, LLC, Marilu Esparza and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08394 |
| October 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Wanda Lanier pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) without prejudice as to Marilu Esparza. (Sadat, Arash) |
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Wanda Lanier, upon Defendant Marilu Esparza served on 9/28/2021, answer due 10/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cian Roche-Person In Charge of Office in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/28/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 25, inclusive, Marilu Esparza, Safway Atlantic, LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Wanda Lanier. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC (Feldman, Catherine) |
| Filing 6 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC, identifying 1. Wanda Lanier, Plaintiff; 2. Safway Atlantic, LLC, Defendant; 3. Marilu Esparza, Defendant; 4. BrandSafway Access Solutions, LLC, the sole member of Safway Atlantic, LLC; 5. Safway Group Holding LLC, the sole member of BrandSafway Access Solutions, LLC; 6. Badger Intermediate Holding LLC, the sole member of Safway Group Holding LLC; 7. Badger Holding LLC, the sole member of Badger Intermediate Holding LLC; and 8. Brand Industrial Services, Inc., the sole member of Badger Holding LLC. (Feldman, Catherine) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Catherine Feldman re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC. (Feldman, Catherine) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Kim Blankenship re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC. (Feldman, Catherine) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Iris Rodriguez re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC. (Feldman, Catherine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC. (Feldman, Catherine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV35068 Receipt No: ACACDC-32202801 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Safway Atlantic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - C to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Catherine S Feldman added to party Safway Atlantic, LLC(pty:dft))(Feldman, Catherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
