John Ho v. Landwin Investments, LLC
| John Ho |
| LANDWIN INVESTMENTS, LLC |
| 2:2021cv08410 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Landwin Investments, LLC (lc) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Landwin Investments, LLC filed by plaintiff John Ho. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Proof of Service) (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Ho, upon Defendant Landwin Investments, LLC served on 11/5/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Fu Shen Chen - Agent for Service in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-08410 FLA(PDx). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Landwin Investments, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Ho, (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32208054 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party John Ho(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: John Ho v. Landwin Investments, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Ho | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Tsao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LANDWIN INVESTMENTS, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
