Ignacio Vera v. Ronan Danchick, LLC et al
| Ignacio Vera |
| Ronan Danchick, LLC and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2021cv08434 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ronan Danchick, LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Ignacio Vera. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ignacio Vera. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32212467 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Ignacio Vera(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
