Azariah M. Ellington v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Azarian M. Ellington |
Department of Veterans Affairs |
2:2021cv08448 |
October 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
R Gary Klausner |
Federal Employer's Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Azarian M. Ellington, re Notice and Waiver of the Service of Summons served on 11/12/2021. (jp) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner, ORDERING Notice and Waiver of Summons to Department of Veterans Affairs submitted by Plaintiff Azarian M. Ellington received on 11/15/2021 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Waiver is to be signed by defendants. (jp) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #3 as to Defendant Department of Veterans Affairs. (et) |
Filing 2 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 from Azarian M. Ellington. Re: Notice Re: Discrepancies with Lodging of Complaint (CV-47),,, #1 . Receipt number LA230548. (dl) |
Filing 1 NOTICE RE: DISCREPANCIES WITH LODGING OF COMPLAINT mailed to Plaintiff Azarian M. Ellington. Upon submission of your complaint, the following discrepancy was found: You have not submitted the entire filing fee amount of $ 402. If you are unable to pay the entire filing fee at this time, you may request that the fee be waived. To do so, you must complete, sign, and return the enclose form, Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), in its entirety. If you do not respond within THIRTY DAYS from the date below, your your action will be dismissed. If your fee waiver request or payment is received within THIRTY DAYS, judges will be assigned to your case. You may return your fee waiver request or payment to any of the Courthouses listed on this notice. Re Lodged Complaint. (Attachments: #1 CV 60 IFP Request) (et) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2021: #2 Lodged Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons) (et). |
LODGED COMPLAINT sought to be filed by Plaintiff Azarian M. Ellington. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Azariah M. Ellington v. Department of Veterans Affairs | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Azarian M. Ellington | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Department of Veterans Affairs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.