Maria Hernandez v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Maria Hernandez
Defendant: TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Does One through Twenty
Case Number: 2:2021cv08469
Filed: October 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., re Declaration, #16 COS - Declaration of John W. Myers Iv Regarding Compliance with The Courts Scheduling Order served on December 10, 2021. (Myers, John)
December 10, 2021 Filing 16 DECLARATION of John W. Myers re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,,,,,,,, 15 Declaration of John W. Myers Iv Regarding Compliance with The Courts Scheduling Order filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to OSC Decl, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to OSC Decl)(Myers, John)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow the rules and orders of this Court. Counsel have failed to comply with the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state the name of that person (only if the person is an attorney) and the position of that person (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the Weeks before trial column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with the rules and orders of this Court, and the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 1, 2021 Filing 14 Demand for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Maria Hernandez (Baker, Terry)
October 28, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 Ntc to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge served on October 28, 2021. (Myers, John)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 12/13/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
October 28, 2021 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 Ntc of Assignment to United States Judges served on October 28, 2021. (Myers, John)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
October 28, 2021 Filing 9 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc... (Myers, John)
October 27, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
October 27, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
October 27, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh)
October 26, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/21/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
October 26, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Maria Hernandez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/7/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
October 26, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 COS of Ntc to Adverse Party of Removal to Fed Court served on October 26, 2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Myers, John)
October 26, 2021 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE Corporate Disclosure Stmt of TMS filed by Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation (Myers, John)
October 26, 2021 Filing 3 Certif & Ntc Int Parties NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation, (Myers, John)
October 26, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation. (Myers, John)
October 26, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV32853 Receipt No: ACACDC-32218765 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Attorney John W Myers, IV added to party TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation(pty:dft))(Myers, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maria Hernandez v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Hernandez
Represented By: Terry L Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Represented By: John W Myers, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: John W Myers, IV
Represented By: Kriston Joseph Guillot
Represented By: Sean D Beatty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does One through Twenty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?