David Dovid Schick v. Nano-X Imaging LTD. et al
Plaintiff: David Dovid Schick
Defendant: Nano-X Imaging LTD., Nanox Imaging PLC., Nano-X Imaging, Inc., Ran Poliakine and Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2021cv08529
Filed: October 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Regarding (1) Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint; and (2) Setting Briefing Schedule on Any Motion to Dismiss #20 . Defendants shall answer on or before 2/15/2022. See Order for specifics. (jp)
December 21, 2021 Filing 20 STIPULATION for Order (1) Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to Complaint; and (2) Setting Briefing Schedule On Any Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Ran Poliakine. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Virginia F Milstead added to party Ran Poliakine(pty:dft))(Milstead, Virginia)
December 7, 2021 Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Nano-X Imaging LTD. answer now due 1/6/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Nano-X Imaging LTD..(Attorney Jeffrey H. Grant added to party Nano-X Imaging LTD.(pty:dft))(Grant, Jeffrey)
November 12, 2021 Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ran Poliakine. (jp)
November 12, 2021 Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nano-X Imaging, Inc. (jp)
November 12, 2021 Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nano-X Imaging LTD. (jp)
November 12, 2021 Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nano-X Imaging LTD. (jp)
November 9, 2021 Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Dovid Schick. (Nelson, Gregory)
November 9, 2021 Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Dovid Schick. (Nelson, Gregory)
November 9, 2021 Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Dovid Schick. (Nelson, Gregory)
November 9, 2021 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Dovid Schick. (Nelson, Gregory)
November 8, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh)
October 29, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Dovid Schick, identifying none. (Nelson, Gregory)
October 28, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh)
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
October 28, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
October 28, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
October 28, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh)
October 28, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Schick. (Nelson, Gregory)
October 28, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Schick. (Nelson, Gregory)
October 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32233274 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff David Schick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Gregory Nelson added to party David Schick(pty:pla))(Nelson, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Dovid Schick v. Nano-X Imaging LTD. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Dovid Schick
Represented By: Gregory Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nano-X Imaging LTD.
Represented By: Jeffrey H. Grant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nanox Imaging PLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nano-X Imaging, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ran Poliakine
Represented By: Virginia F Milstead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?