Eugenie Micheline Barbeau v. Internal Revenue Service
| Eugenie Micheline Barbeau |
| Internal Revenue Service |
| 2:2021cv08544 |
| October 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Internal Revenue Service answer now due 2/3/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant Internal Revenue Service.(Attorney Nithya Senra added to party Internal Revenue Service(pty:dft))(Senra, Nithya) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (yl)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, ORDERING Proof of Service submitted by Plaintiff Eugenie Micheline Barbeau received on 11/01/2021 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Incomplete proof of service. Date and location missing. (yl)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Internal Revenue Service. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Eugenie Micheline Barbeau. (esa) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Eugenie Micheline Barbeau. (esa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Internal Revenue Service.Case assigned to Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F Eick, (Filing fee $ 402 paid), filed by plaintiff Eugenie Micheline Barbeau. (Attachments: #1 CV 71, #2 Summons Request) (esa) Modified on 10/29/2021 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eugenie Micheline Barbeau v. Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugenie Micheline Barbeau | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
| Represented By: | Nithya Senra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
