Edis Ramirez et al v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company et al
| Edis Ramirez, Hoa Nguyen, Mung Nguyen and State of California |
| Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company doing business as Allstate and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08560 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
STIPULATION to Clarify for Plaintiffs' counsel to appear remotely filed by Plaintiffs Hoa Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nghiem, Van)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr, (vcr)
|
|
Filing 24
PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
|
Filing 23
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The DOE defendants remaining after 2/14/2022 are dismissed by operation of this Order and without further notice. The Court vacates the mandatory scheduling conference set for 12/17/2021 and issues this case management order. The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) report #22 and sets the pretrial and trial dates noted in this order based on an evaluation of the complexity of the case. Jury Trial set for 1/5/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 12/19/2022 10:00 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties (Hearing Deadline) 2/14/2022. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 8/15/2022. Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 9/12/2022. Non-Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 9/26/2022. Settlement Conference Deadline 10/11/2022. Post-Settlement Status Conference set for 10/24/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Report due by 10/17/2022. Trial Filings (First Set) Deadline 11/21/2022. Trial Filings (Second Set) Deadline 12/5/2022. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing 22
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial Defendant: 4 days, filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company.. (Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 21
MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court strikes the MOTION to Supplement Application to appear remotely filed by Plaintiffs #19 , without prejudice to refiling in accordance with the Court's standing order (provided that the refiling is otherwise timely), see Notice of Filer of Deficiencies #20 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing 20
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Ninth NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Supplement Application to appear remotely #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. The untimely "Motion" is set for hearing on 12/17/2021 at 8:30 AM--the same date/time as the Scheduling Conference, Local Rule 6-1. Lacking statement re conference of counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3. The proposed order is on page 4. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
|
|
Filing 19
[DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 12/6/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 21] Ninth NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Supplement Application to appear remotely filed by Plaintiffs Hoa Nguyen, Mung Nguyen, Edis Ramirez. Motion set for hearing on 12/17/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Nghiem, Van) Modified on 12/6/2021 (gk).
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. correcting NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #16 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Motion to Dismiss [DKT #16], #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for 12/17/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. The parties shall file a joint Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/7/2021. (vcr)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. Motion set for hearing on 2/11/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Steven Levy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, designating Paul Kakuske as local counsel #13 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Mark Hanover to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, designating Paul Kakuske as local counsel #12 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 13
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Steven M. Levy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32273298) filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 12
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Mark L. Hanover to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32273229) filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY'S DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT #10 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court orders as follows: Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company's last day to respond to the Second Amended Complaint is extended to November 24, 2021. (lom)
|
|
Filing 10
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company answer now due 11/24/2021, re Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon the filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (lh)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Pedro V. Castillo. New Case Number 2:21-cv-08560 SB (PVCx). (lh)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, Does, filed by Plaintiff Edis Ramirez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/21/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, Does amending Complaint,, filed by Plaintiff Edis Ramirez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/4/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, Does amending First Amended Complaint,, filed by Plaintiffs State of California, Edis Ramirez, Mung Nguyen, Hoa Nguyen. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/20/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
|
|
Filing 4
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, re Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 served on October 28, 2021. (Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 3
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company identifying The Allstate Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Kakuske, Paul)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the States of California County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV26802 Receipt No: ACACDC-32235405 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Second Amended Verified Complaint for Money and Damages, Injunctive Relief and Declaratory Relief, #2 7-21-21 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 7-21-21 Complaint, #4 7-21-21 Notice of Case Assignment, #5 7-21-21 Summons, #6 7-30-21 Notice of Case Management, #7 8-4-21 First Amended Complaint, #8 9-15-21 Clerk's Certificate of Service, #9 Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, #10 9-15-21 Minute Order, #11 9-17-21 Minute Order, #12 9-21-21 Second Amended Complaint, #13 Summons) (Attorney Paul M Kakuske added to party Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company(pty:dft))(Kakuske, Paul)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
