Thuy Thanh Alonzo v. California Patients Alliance, Inc. et al
| Thuy Thanh Alonzo |
| California Patients Alliance, Inc., d/b/a House of Flowers and California Patients Alliance, Inc. a California corporation doing business as House of Flowers |
| 2:2021cv08593 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant California Patients Alliance, Inc., (Artest, Isaiah) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/27/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 2/10/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Compliance with Local Rule 7.1-1 is required no later than December 8, 2021 or the Answer may be stricken. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant California Patients Alliance, Inc..(Attorney Isaiah Thomas Artest added to party California Patients Alliance, Inc.(pty:dft))(Artest, Isaiah) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER RE: ADA ACCESSIBILITY CASES by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo, upon Defendant California Patients Alliance, Inc. served on 11/12/2021, answer due 12/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ariella Joffe, Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant California Patients Alliance, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo, (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32245655 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo. (Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Thuy Thanh Alonzo(pty:pla))(Coelho, Thiago) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
