Brand Surgical Institute v. Line Construction Benefit Fund et al
| Brand Surgical Institute |
| Line Construction Benefit Fund and DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv08594 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-entitled action has settled #19 , IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute. (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 18 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois #15 filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund. (O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute. Motion set for hearing on 2/28/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proposed Order) (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 16 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Brand Surgical Institute amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute(Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund. Motion set for hearing on 2/28/2022 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Kevin Chesniak, #3 Exhibit 1-A of Decl. of Kevin Chesniak, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Proof of Service) (O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE 26 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #13 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The Scheduling Conference is scheduled for March 21, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. (lom)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Rule 26F Scheduling Conference filed by plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 1/31/2022 at 1:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (vv)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (vv)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-08594 VAP(JCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-08594 CAS(JCx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund, re Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #5 , Reminder Notice to Counsel (CV-14) re MJ Civil Consent Pilot Project - optional html form, #6 served on November 5, 2021. (O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund.(O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Line Construction Benefit Fund. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/5/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on October 29, 2021. (O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund, identifying Brand Surgical Institute. (O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund. (O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STLC05799 Receipt No: ACACDC-32245811 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Line Construction Benefit Fund. (Attorney Benjamin M O'Donnell added to party Line Construction Benefit Fund(pty:dft))(O'Donnell, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
