Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto v. Kirk Richard Berry
| Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto |
| Kirk Richard Berry and Does 1 to 25, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08607 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on January 10, 2022 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
|
Filing 15
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION (ECF No. #12 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court (ECF No. #12 ) and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion(s), noticed for hearing on January 10, 2022, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 6-7, filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Mekha, Moreen) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry. (Kuck, Danielle) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT filed by PLAINTIFF Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto. Motion set for hearing on 1/10/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Memorandum) (Karimian, Shahin) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry, served on November 18, 2021. (Kuck, Danielle) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 1/10/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-08607 MCS(KSx). (rn) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry. (Kuck, Danielle) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry, served on November 9, 2021. (Kuck, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Kirk Richard Berry, Does, filed by Plaintiff Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/18/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto, upon Defendant Kirk Richard Berry served on 10/2/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kirk Richard Berry in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/28/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| Filing 3 Certification And Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry, identifying Rafael Gonzalez-Barreto, Kirk Richard Berry. (Kuck, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry. (Kuck, Danielle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21stcv10521 Receipt No: ACACDC-32249958 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Kirk Richard Berry. (Attorney Danielle Lyn Kuck added to party Kirk Richard Berry(pty:dft))(Kuck, Danielle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
