WRPV XIV Olive LA, LLC v. Hyunsung Yang
| WRPV XIV Olive LA, LLC |
| Hyunsung Yang |
| Haerean Kwon |
| 2:2021cv08611 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Karen E Scott |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Mail Returned addressed to Hyunsung Yang re Order to Reassign Case pursuant to GO 21-01 (CV-81) #6 . (gk) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012. (bm) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff timely responded to the OSC and argued for remand on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case and that Defendant's notice was untimely. Dkt. No. 10. Defendant failed to respond to the OSC. Thus, the Court hereby REMANDS this case to Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Court also admonishes Defendant for ignoring a Court order and cautions him against doing so again. (see document for further details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
| Filing 10 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff WRPV XIV Olive LA, LLC. Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Remand; Declaration in Support and proof of service. (Arakelian, Agop) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES [In Chambers] Order to Show Cause re Jurisdiction by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: The Court therefore orders both Plaintiff and Defendant to show cause why: (1) the Court has jurisdiction over this case, (2) the notice was timely filed, and (3) this case should not be remanded to state court.1 The parties are ordered to show cause in writing by no later than 11/16/2021. (See Minutes for further details). (jp)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for 12/10/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. The parties shall file a joint Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/30/2021. (vcr)
|
|
Filing 7
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE Pursuant General Order 21-01 (identical case) by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Case Management and Assignment Committee Chair. Case transferred to the calendar of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. All discovery matters are transferred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-08611 SB(MARx). (rn)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Haerean Kwon. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Haerean Kwon and Hyunsung Yang. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, filed by Defendant Haerean Kwon, case number 21STUD01419 with copy of complaint. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
