Sam Kim v. Ironforge Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Sam Kim
Defendant: Ironforge Corp. and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 2:2021cv08615
Filed: November 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1))(Docket No. #9 ), filed on November 19, 2021, the case is now CLOSED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (afe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 19, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Sam Kim. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Kim, Jason)
November 19, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by PLAINTIFF Sam Kim. (Kim, Jason)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (hr)
November 3, 2021 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ironforge Corp.. (car)
November 3, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV11-C) (car)
November 1, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Sam Kim. (Kim, Jason)
November 1, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason)
November 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sam Kim. (Kim, Jason)
November 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32251546 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Sam Kim(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sam Kim v. Ironforge Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sam Kim
Represented By: Jason J Kim
Represented By: Jason T Yoon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ironforge Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?