Mens Suit Outlet, Inc. v. Amguard Insurance Company et al
Men's Suit Outlet, Inc. and Mens Suit Outlet, Inc. |
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation, AmGuard Insurance Company, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2021cv08735 |
November 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Dale S Fischer |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 11/28/2022. (vv) |
Filing 20 Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 2/21/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (vv) |
Filing 19 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv) |
Filing 18 STATUS REPORT JOINT RULE 26 REPORT filed by Plaintiff Mens Suit Outlet, Inc.. (Keusseyan, Eileen) |
Filing 17 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR AND UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court, on its own motion, takes the Motion #12 set for Monday, January 24, 2022 off calendar and under submission. The Court will set a new hearing date if it decides oral argument would be helpful. A written order will follow. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 DECLARATION of Eileen Keusseyan NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #12 re Dismissal of Defendant Sedgwick filed by Plaintiff Mens Suit Outlet, Inc.. (Attorney Eileen Keusseyan added to party Mens Suit Outlet, Inc.(pty:pla))(Keusseyan, Eileen) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc..(Tricker, Richard) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant AmGuard Insurance Company.(Kaneshiro, Wynn) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 2/7/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 1/24/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard P. Tricker in Support of Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss) (Tricker, Richard) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant AmGuard Insurance Company, identifying WestGUARD Insurance Company; National Indemnity Company; and, Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. (Kaneshiro, Wynn) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to AmGuard Insurance Company answer now due 1/7/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant AmGuard Insurance Company.(Kaneshiro, Wynn) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants AmGuard Insurance Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Mens Suit Outlet, Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/26/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Mens Suit Outlet, Inc., upon Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. served on 10/8/2021, answer due 10/29/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Glenda Sheppard-Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/18/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation, re Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Joinder (non-motion) #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 11/05/2021. (Tricker, Richard) |
Filing 4 JOINDER filed by Defendant AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation joining in Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (Tricker, Richard) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation identifying Carlyle Group as Corporate Parent. (Tricker, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation. (Tricker, Richard) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV27689 Receipt No: ACACDC-32280231 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard P. Tricker in Support of Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.'s Notice of Removal) (Attorney Richard P Tricker added to party SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., an Illinois corporation(pty:dft))(Tricker, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.