Brands United Ltd. v. Universal Studios Licensing LLC et al
| Brands United Ltd. |
| Universal Studios Licensing LLC and Universal Studios Limited |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08764 |
| November 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Universal Studios Licensing LLC, Universal Studios Limited, (Su, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Universal Studios Licensing LLC, Universal Studios Limited. (Su, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior of California, Los Angeles County, case number 21STCP03301 Receipt No: ACACDC-32285951 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Universal Studios Limited, Universal Studios Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Petition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Tat Declaration, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Matthews Declaration, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Chao Declaration) (Attorney Alexander Su added to party Universal Studios Licensing LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Alexander Su added to party Universal Studios Limited(pty:dft))(Su, Alexander)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
