Thomas Ayer et al v. Michael White et al
| Thomas Ayer, Alexis Ayer and Hovik Grozian |
| Michael White, David Green, R4U Ventures, DOES 1 through 50 and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08773 |
| November 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1964 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kevin W. Vice to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant R4U Ventures (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32581116) filed by Defendant R4U Ventures. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Koletsky, Roy) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney J. Scott Dilbeck to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant R4U Ventures (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32580358) filed by Defendant R4U Ventures. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Koletsky, Roy) |
| Filing 15 Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)) #12 , #13 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)) #12 Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Ayer, Thomas Ayer, Hovik Grozian. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Lawrence Brennan in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Brennan, Lawrence) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing Motion to Dismiss #12 #13 . On 12/2/2021, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss without setting a hearing date. On 12/8/2021, Defendants filed a Notice of Motion #13 setting the motion at #12 for hearing on 1/25/2022, at 10:00 a.m. The Motion to Dismiss #12 is accepted as filed with a hearing date of 1/25/22. The parties and counsel shall refer to Docket Entry 12 as the operative motion. (jre) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Hearing Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)) #12 , filed by Defendants David Green, R4U Ventures, Michael White. Motion set for hearing on 1/25/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. (Koletsky, Roy) Modified on 12/8/2021 (jre). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)) filed by Defendant David Green, R4U Ventures, Michael White. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #2 Exhibit 1A to Declaration of Michael White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #3 Exhibit 1B to Declaration of Michael White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #4 Exhibit 1C to Declaration of Michael White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #5 Exhibit 1D to Declaration of Michael White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #6 Exhibit 1E to Declaration of Michael White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #7 Exhibit 1F to Declaration of Michael White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #8 Declaration of David Green in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #9 Declaration of Jennifer White in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #10 Declaration of Scott Dilbeck in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #11 Exhibit 4A to Declaration of Scott Dilbeck in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #12 Exhibit 4B to Declaration of Scott Dilbeck in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #13 Exhibit 4C to Declaration of Scott Dilbeck in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #14 Exhibit 4D to Declaration of Scott Dilbeck in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #15 Declaration Declaration of Scott Dilbeck RE L.R. 7-3 in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2)), #16 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss for lack of Personal Jurisdiction (FRCP 12(b)(2))) (Attorney Roy A Koletsky added to party David Green(pty:dft), Attorney Roy A Koletsky added to party R4U Ventures(pty:dft), Attorney Roy A Koletsky added to party Michael White(pty:dft)) (Koletsky, Roy) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants David Green, R4U Ventures, Michael White. (shb) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #8 filed by plaintiffs Alexis Ayer, Thomas Ayer, Hovik Grozian. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Addendum to Request for Summonses - Additional Defendants)(Brennan, Lawrence) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Miscellaneous Document #4 . The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Interested Parties CV-30 filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Ayer, Thomas Ayer, Hovik Grozian (Brennan, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Alexis Ayer, Thomas Ayer, Hovik Grozian. (Brennan, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by plaintiff Alexis Ayer, Thomas Ayer, Hovik Grozian. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Appendix of Additional Named Defendants / Summoned Parties)(Brennan, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32288103 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Thomas Ayer, Hovik Grozian, Alexis Ayer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A pages 1-3, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B pages 1-12, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C pages 1-4, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E pages 1-2, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F pages 1-7, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G pages 1-3) (Attorney Lawrence P Brennan, Jr added to party Alexis Ayer(pty:pla), Attorney Lawrence P Brennan, Jr added to party Thomas Ayer(pty:pla), Attorney Lawrence P Brennan, Jr added to party Hovik Grozian(pty:pla))(Brennan, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
