Channel Development, Inc. v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company et al
| Channel Development, Inc. |
| QBE Specialty Insurance Company and Does 1 to 25, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08819 |
| November 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Steven C Shuman counsel for Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc.. Adding Andrew M. Jacobson as counsel of record for Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Plaintiff. (Shuman, Steven) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Steven C Shuman counsel for Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc.. Adding Steven C. Shuman as counsel of record for Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Plaintiff. (Shuman, Steven) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #16 , Notice of Appearance #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Steven C Shuman on behalf of Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc. (Shuman, Steven) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Steven C Shuman on behalf of Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc. (Attorney Steven C Shuman added to party Channel Development, Inc.(pty:pla))(Shuman, Steven) |
Filing 14
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than October 17, 2022. (smo)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/30/2023 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 2/14/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo)
|
|
Filing 12
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on January 10, 2022 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan and Scheduling Conference Report ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates)(Furtado, David) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc., (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Lead Counsel)(Furtado, David) |
| Filing 9 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David J Furtado on behalf of Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Lead Trial Counsel, #2 Supplement Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties)(Furtado, David) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 1/10/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant QBE Specialty Insurance Company. (Kalunian, Monica) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant QBE Specialty Insurance Company identifying QBE Insurance Group, Ltd. as Corporate Parent. (Kalunian, Monica) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV32484 Receipt No: ACACDC-32299195 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant QBE Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D (State Answer)) (Attorney Monica Mendes Kalunian added to party QBE Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Kalunian, Monica) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, QBE Specialty Insurance Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Channel Development, Inc. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/9/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant QBE Specialty Insurance Company. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/5/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
