Todd Harris v. Ford Motor Company
| Todd Harris |
| Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv08842 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| John E McDermott |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal #13 is APPROVED. The entire action, including all claims stated herein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (gk)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to case settled filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of the parties notice of settlement, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By December 27, 2021, the parties shall file either (1) a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal of the action or judgment, or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of December 28, 2021. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. All scheduled dates and deadlines are hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (shb)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Todd Harris. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/3/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2021 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV28891 Receipt No: ACACDC-32305800 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Todd Harris in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/5/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) Modified on 11/10/2021 (jtil). |
| CONFORMED COPY ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company in Los Angeles Superior Court on 9/2/2021, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
