Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC v. Cartrack, Inc.
| Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC |
| Cartrack, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv08940 |
| November 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case transferred from Judge Fernando M. Olguin to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:21-cv-08940 MCS(PLAx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-08940 FMO(PLAx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Cartrack, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC, identifying Patent Asset Management LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32321004 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Stephen M Lobbin added to party Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC(pty:pla))(Lobbin, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC v. Cartrack, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stephen M Lobbin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cartrack, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
