Robert O. Dinkins v. USA et al
Robert O. Dinkins |
USA, USP Lompoc Medical Dr., Hospital Dr, BOP Director and Warden |
2:2021cv08942 |
November 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Christina A Snyder |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order DENYING Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #2 ) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the application to proceed IFP (Dkt. #2 ) is denied. Because Plaintiff may be able to amend his allegations to show that he is in imminent danger, he is granted leave to file an amended application for IFP within 30 day(s) of the date of this order. Denying #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. (See document for details.) (es) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Robert O. Dinkins. (jtil) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Robert O. Dinkins against Defendants BOP Director, Hospital Dr, USA, USP Lompoc Medical Dr., and Warden, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.