Darryl Ray Mills v. Lateshia Shanae Dunn-Johnson
Plaintiff: Darryl Ray Mills
Defendant: Lateshia Shanae Dunn-Johnson
Case Number: 2:2021cv08970
Filed: November 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE to Court Notice both Mediation and Denial to Proceed IFP #10 filed by Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills. (jp)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge John A. Kronstadt that the request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees #2 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for the following reasons: (1) District Court lacks jurisdiction. (2) Frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claimupon which relief may be granted. See attached pages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REFERRING APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DKT. #3 ) TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALEXANDER F. MACKINNON by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the Motion and has concluded that this matter can be referred to Judge MacKinnon for his to review with an order to be presented this Court for a final determination. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 16, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
November 16, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
November 16, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh)
November 12, 2021 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE by First Class Mail, filed by Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills, served on Summons. (lh)
November 12, 2021 Filing 4 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in Support Thereof, filed by Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills. Re: APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order #3 (lh)
November 12, 2021 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order filed as Complaint in Support of Restraining Order, filed by Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills. (lh)
November 12, 2021 Filing 2 REQUEST to Waive Court Fees, filed by Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills. (lh)
November 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Lateshia Shanae Dunn-Johnson. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Filed by Plaintiff Darryl Ray Mills. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Darryl Ray Mills v. Lateshia Shanae Dunn-Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darryl Ray Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lateshia Shanae Dunn-Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?